Механизмы релятивизации в разных языках

Синтаксические характеристики и семантика относительных конструкций. Особенности релятивизации в русском и английском языках по данным Национального корпуса русского языка. Сходства и различия русских, английских относительных конструкций, их ограничения.

Рубрика Иностранные языки и языкознание
Вид дипломная работа
Язык русский
Дата добавления 11.06.2018
Размер файла 128,7 K

Отправить свою хорошую работу в базу знаний просто. Используйте форму, расположенную ниже

Студенты, аспиранты, молодые ученые, использующие базу знаний в своей учебе и работе, будут вам очень благодарны.

27. Bhatt R. 2002. The raising analysis of relative clauses: evidence from adjectival modification // Natural Language Semantics. Vol. 10, No. 1. P. 43--90

28. Bach, E. and COOPER, R. (1978) The NP-S analysisof relative clauses and compositional semantics.Linguistics and Philosophy 2, 145-50

29. Bhatt, R. (2000) Adjectival modifiers and the raising analysis of relative clauses. North-eastern Linguistic Society 30, 55-67.

30. Bianchi, V. (2000) The raising analysis of relative clauses: a reply to Borsley. Linguistic Inquiry 31, 123-40.

31. Borsley, R. (1997). Relative clauses and the theory of phrase structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 28, 629-647

32. Chomksy, N. (1965). Aspect of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Pres

33. Choueiri, L. (2002). Revisiting relatives: issues in the syntax of resumptive restrictive relatives. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.

34. Comrie, B. (2007). The acquisition of relative clauses in relation to language typology. SSLA, 29 301-309

35. Comrie B. Rethinking the typology of relative clauses // Language Design, vol. 1, 1998. P. 59-86.

36. Cinque G. 2008. Two types of non-restrictive relatives // O. Bonami, P. Cabredo Hofherr (eds). Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 7. Paris. P. 99-- 137. [http://www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss7/].

37. Cristofaro S., Giacalone Ramat A. Relativization strategies in the languages of Europe // Ramat P., Roma E. (eds.). Europe and Mediterranean as Linguistic Areas: Convergences from a Historical and Typological Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series 88]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 2007. P. 63-93.

38. Cinque G. 2011. On double-headed relatives // Linguнstica. Revista de Estudos Linguнsticos da Universidade do Porto. Vol. 6, No. 1. P. 67--92.

39. Cole P. 1987. The structure of internally headed relative clauses // Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. Vol. 5, No. 2. P. 277--302.

40. Comrie B. 1998. Rethinking the typology of relative clauses // Language Design. Vol. 1. P. 59--86.

41. Comrie B., Kuteva T. 2011. Relativization on Subjects // Dryer, Haspelmath (eds) 2011.

42. de Vries M. 2005. The fall and rise of universals on relativization // Journal of Universal Language. Vol. 6. P. 1--33.

43. Downing B. 1978. Some universals of relative clause structure // J. Greenberg (ed.). Universals of Language. Vol. 4: Syntax. Stanford: Stanford University Press. P. 375--418.

44. Dryer M.S. 2011b. Order of relative clause and noun // Dryer, Haspelmath (eds) 2011

45. Diessel, H. & Tomasello, M. (2005). A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses. Language 81, 1-25.

46. Doughty, C. (1988). The effect of instruction on the acquisition of relativization in English as a second language. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Pennsylvania.

47. Emonds J. Appositive relatives have no properties // Linguistic Inquiry.- 1979. - Vol. 10. - С. 211 - 243.

48. Eckman, F., Bell, L. & Nelson, D. (1988). On the generalization of relative clause instruction in the acquisition of English as a second language. Applied Linguistics, 9 (1), 1-20.

49. Fabb, Nigel. 1990. The difference between English restrictive and non- restrictive relative clauses. Journal of Linguistics 26:57-77

50. Fowler G. Oblique passivization in Russian // The Slavic and East European Journal, vol. 40 (3).1996. P. 519-545.

51. Fillmore, Charles J. The case for case reopened. Syntax and Semantics Grammatical Relations. Peter Cole and Jerrold Sadock. New York, Academic Press

52. Fox B.A., Thompson S.A. 1990. A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation // Language. Vol. 66. No. 2. P. 297--316.

53. Givуn T. Grammatical relations in passive clauses: A diachronic perspective // Abraham W.,Leisiц L. (eds.). Passivization and Typology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 2006. P. 337-350.

54. Grosu, Landmann 1998 -- Grosu A., Landman F. Strange relatives of the third kind // Natural Language Semantics. 1998. Vol. 6. P. 125-170.

55. Johansson, C., & Geisler, C. (1998). Pied-piping in spoken English. In

A. Renouf (Ed.), Explorations in Corpus Linguistics (pp. 67--82). Amsterdam: Rodopi

56. Hudson, Richard. 2015. Pied piping in cognition

57. Jacobson P. 1995. On the quantificational source of English free relatives // E. Bach et al. (eds) Quantification in Natural Languages. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer. P. 451--486.

58. Kompendium seiner Grammatik. (Language universals series, vol. 3). Tьbingen: Narr, 1984.Lehmann Сh. On the typology of relative clauses // Linguistics, vol. 24 (4), 1986. P. 663-680.

59. Keenan E., Dryer M. Passives in the world's languages // Shopen T. (ed.). LanguageTypologyandSyntactic Description. Cambridge: CUP. 2007. P. 325- 361.

60. Keenan E.L. 1985. Relative clauses // T. Shopen (ed.). Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. II: Complex Constructions. Cambridge etc: Cambridge University Press. P. 141--170.

61. Kibrik A.A. 1992. Relativization in polysynthetic languages // International Journal of American Linguistics. Vol. 58, No. 2. P. 135--157

62. Kuroda 1968 -- Kuroda S-Y. English relativization and certain related problems // Language. 1968. Vol. 44. P. 244-266.

63. Maxwell D. N. Strategies of relativization and NP accessibility // Language 55(2). 1979. P. 352-371.

64. Nikolaeva I. 2006. Relative clauses // K. Brown (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. 2nd edition. Vol. 10. Oxford: Elsevier. P. 501--508.

65. Perlmutter D.M., Ross J.R. 1970. Relative clauses with split antecedents

// Linguistic Inquiry. Vol. 1, No. 3. P. 350.

66. Ross J.R. in his dissertation, "Constraints on variables in syntax" (MIT, 1967).

67. Rodman R. Scope phenomena, “movement transformations” and relative clauses // Montague grammar / Partee B.H. (ed.). - New York: Academic Press, 1976. - C. 165 - 176.

68. Stowell T. Appositive and parenthetical relative clauses // Organizing grammar: Linguistic studies in honor of Henk van Riemsdijk. / Broekhuis H., Corver N., Koster J. et al. (eds.). - Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2005. - C. 608 - 617

69. Schachter P. 1973. Focus and relativization // Language. Vol. 49, No. 1. P. 19-- 46.

70. Siewierska A. Passive constructions // Haspelmath M. et al. (eds.). The World Atlas of Language

71. Structures. Oxford, 2005. P. 434-437

72. Shibatani M. Passives and related constructions: a prototype analysis // Language, vol. 61 (4). 1985.P. 821-848.

73. Sigurd B. A Supplementary Relativization Hierarchy Based on the Complexity of the Relative Phrase // Studia Linguistica, 1989. Vol. 43, № 1, pp. 33- 46.

74. Say S. S. Antipassives and A-relativization: between syntax and discourse pragmatics. Handout.

Размещено на Allbest.ru

...

Подобные документы

Работы в архивах красиво оформлены согласно требованиям ВУЗов и содержат рисунки, диаграммы, формулы и т.д.
PPT, PPTX и PDF-файлы представлены только в архивах.
Рекомендуем скачать работу.