The phenomenon of "implicit order" of in-depth cognition of the psyche

Размещено на http://www.allbest.ru/

Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy

The phenomenon of "implicit order” of in-depth cognition of the psyche

Yatsenko Tamara Semenivna

Doctor of Psychology Sciences

Head of the deep correction and

psycho-social rehabilitation department

Summary

The article is devoted to the essential issue of understanding the wholeness of the psyche in its phenomenological nature.

The article highlights the binomial nature of the psyche's organisation system within its phenomenological nature. It considers the fundamental character of the conscious and the unconscious spheres ' inherence principle, as well as the significance of disclosure of the nature of informational-distant interrelations of the conscious and the unconscious at their tangent point within the Active Social Psychological Cognition (ASPC) diagnostic-correctional process. The article asserts that none of the spheres can exist outside the unified psyche system.

The article emphasises the statement that the "implicit order" represents the interests of both the conscious and the unconscious, consequently integrating power fields of both spheres. This proves the existence of over-determination of the implicit order. The introduction of the category of the psyche's activity order facilitates clarification and completion of the structural "Model of the psyche's internal dynamics" with the substructural elements of "invisible horizon" and "implicit order" (marked with a line of dots between the conscious and the unconscious).

Keywords: diagnostic-correctional process, implicitus, consciousness, the model, self-preservation, willingness.

Анотація

Статтю присвячено актуальній проблемі розуміння цілісності психіки у феноменологічній її сутності.

У статті підкреслюються: біномність системи організації психічного в його феноменологічній сутності; фундаментальність принципу невід'ємності сфер свідомого і несвідомого; актуальність розкриття характеру інформаційно-дистанційних взаємозв'язків свідомого і несвідомого на межі їх дотичності в діагностико-корекційному процесі АСПП; неможливість існування жодної зі сфер поза межами єдиної системи психічного.

Стверджується, що "імпліцитний порядок" виражає інтереси як свідомого, так і несвідомого, тобто інтегрує силові поля обох сфер. Це доводить надвизначеність імпліцитного порядку. Введення цієї категорії активності психічного сприяє уточненню та довершенню структурної "Моделі внутрішньої динаміки психіки" підструктурними елементами: "Невидимий горизонт" і "Імпліцитний порядок" (позначено крапками між свідомим і несвідомим).

Ключові слова: діагностико-корекційний процес, "Імпліцитний порядок", свідомість, модель, самозбереження, готовність.

Аннотация

Статья посвящена актуальной проблеме понимания целостности психики в её феноменологической сущности.

В статье подчеркиваются: биномность системы организации психического в его феноменологической сущности; фундаментальность принципа неотъемлемости сознательного и бессознательного; актуальность раскрытия характера информационно-дистанционных взаимосвязей сознательного и бессознательного на границе их соприкосновения в диагностико-коррекционном процессе АСПП; невозможность существования каждой из сфер вне пределов единой системы психического.

Утверждается, что "имплицитный порядок" выражает интересы как сознательного, так и бессознательного, то есть интегрирует силовые поля обеих сфер. Это доказывает существование надопределенности имплицитного порядка. Введение этой категории порядка активности психического способствует уточнению и довершению структурной "Модели внутренней динамики психики" подструктурными элементами: "Невидимый горизонт" и "Имплицитный порядок" (обозначено точками между сознательным и бессознательным).

Ключевые слова: диагностико-коррекционный процесс,

"Имплицитный порядок", сознание, модель, самосохранение, готовность.

Statement of the Problem. The article presents the research results aimed at gaining cognition of the adults's psyche in its wholeness. The psychodynamic approach, mentioned in the article, was founded in 1978 [7]. The study was designed to develop a method of depth cognition of the psyche in its wholeness, synthesising scientific-practical achievements within various psychological approaches, oriented not only towards pure scientific studies, but, above all, towards the provision of real help for people.

The issue of an adequate understanding of the psyche of socially adapted people, requiring help in the individualised psychocorrection, which aims at catalysis of the personal growth and self-actualisation, has been left open for an extended period. Initially, educators represented the first group of researchers, however, since 1990, psychologists who need personal correction because of their professional orientation to providing help to other people, added up to the group.

Development of the method of Active Social-Psychological Cognition (ASPC) presupposed focussing on the disclosure of the whole psyche functioning patterns. Over the years, depth studies of the psyche have been conducted in a spiral shape: from a theory into practice - from generalisation of the practical results - back to the theory etc. Consequently, in resolving the issues remaining significant for more than thirty years of research, the focus has been placed on methodological principles, which contributed to the individualisation of diagnostic- instrumental aspects of the ASPC correctional process rather than on "techniques of working with people". Recognition of the wholeness of the psyche in its self- organising abilities, as the fundamental issue of the psychodynamic methodology, has exacerbated the problem of the "implicit order" category disclosure. In Latin, the word implicitus, later form of implicatus meant hidden, implied but not plainly expressed; one that is clearly not opened; that do not find by a cursory observation [2, p. 230].

The aim of the article is an attempt to reveal the central sequence of systemic organisation of the whole psyche with its preconscious formations. The latters have been preset by the effects of displacement and are fixed in the corresponding power centres, which integrate and create preconditions for the emergence of the “implicit order”, where the interconnection of two spheres of "the conscious/ the unconscious" is rooted.

Methods The findings, presented in the article, are based on the analysis of the verbatim material of the psyche's depth studies during the process of Active Social-Psychological Cognition.

The main presentation The conscious and the unconscious arise and function through a binomial system of relations. The duality of the human psyche's structure "the conscious/the unconscious" has remained an insufficiently studied issue. The causes concerning the fact that none of the psyche's spheres cannot fuctionally substitute for each other, as well as be studied without considering the other part of the structure, are still unresolved. The conscious and the unconscious psyche structures exclude one another reciprocally on a functional level and concurrently maintain their interrelationship within the unified system of the psyche's wholeness, without which they completely cease to exist as the psyche. The conscious psyche, as well as the unconscious one, gives meaning to a subject's involuntary action, not because of (or through) the removal of contradictions, but due to the activity within their controversial nature.

A. Sheroziya demonstrates that "the binomial system of relations can serve a fundamental principle of the conscious and the unconscious inerrelation" [4, p. 355]. We associate this interrelation in psychodynamic paradigm with the concept of the implicit order, relating to the boundary (horizon) of reciprocal influences of the conscious and the unconscious. We are convinced of this phenomenon being generated by the "formation" beyond the experience, with the former being catalysed by the basal defence mechanisms, and manifested in the psyche's discrepant inclinations "towards the strength" and "towards the weakness" [7]. Features of the internal implicit order are prearranged by the ability of the specific individual's psyche to follow something that is determined internally and acquires the opportunity of the experimantal clarification only under conditions of the subject's involuntary behaviour and its psychoanalysis in the dialogic communication within the system "psychologist - respondent" ("P.^R.").

"The model of the psyche's internal dynamics" shows the implicit order marked with dots that draw the "line" of the invisible horizon. Each dot indicates the intersection of "the vertical" and "the horizontal" in the act of an involuntary activity of the subject. Regarding the data above, the implicit order is not subject to scholastic requirements of the logic, and therefore it only sets the dynamics of "following the...". It lies beyond the criteria of rationality and irrationality in the subject's behaviour.

Thus, the implicit order causes the inner drive (latent motive) for a subject's activity regardless of the rational or irrational nature of behaviours. The psychodynamic paradigm, which forms the basis of the research, affirms that the internal basal conflict of "life - death" stands at the back of the implicit order. The consciousness has not been aware of the conflict, as it is familiarised itself only with the instinct for self-preservation. The specified conflict camouflages itself from the consciousness with the system of psychological defence mechanisms, which transforms the conflict into certain personal contradictions, linked to the inclinations "to the psychological death" and to the psyche's impotence. No wonder, G. Hegel wrote, that "every consciousness is a relationship of dual nature; consciousness as a single relationship in general is a contradiction" (as cited in [4, p. 357]).

Regarding a person's knowledge of their inner world, S. Leclaire mentions that it looks as if split and illogical; it disguises himself occasionally or presents itself in the mist of its imagination [1]. Therefore, the human archetypal predisposition to symbolisation of their psychological fundamental nature in its wholeness is evident. The image is capable of holistic representation of the psyche's split and dual nature.

There is a world of repressed feelings, linked by S. Freud to the symbolisation of the unconscious activity "on the other side of the consciousness". This fact coordinates with S. Leclair's view of the unconscious to be the "conscious- werewolf' [1, p. 357]. In particular, he affirms that if this feature of the unconscious psyche does not manifest as symbolic images of the consciousness (alienated by itself long ago), we would know nothing about it [1]. Consciousness produces its own attitude to such formations of the psyche through the person's attitude to themselves and to everything around. Therefore, the psychodynamic paradigm of the dialogic interaction in the scheme "P.^R." is built just based on these principles. The consciousness may be interpreted as using the defence system to mask the controversial nature of the psyche. Because of the image symbols such as reveries, art, religion, dreams, lucid dreams etc., the conscious ackowledges exoginous manifestation of the mysterious desires under conditions of masking (hiding) their contents, which are protected by resistance not allowing any access to the latent contents of the psyche. For example, while under hypnosis, a person does something unconsciously, although able to rationalise grounds of that behaviour later on, even if the fact of rationalisation is concealed from their consciousness.

We concur with A. Sheroziya that "... it is necessary to treat the unconscious psyche as to what may be perceived as a kind of the "anticonsciousness" [4, p. 359]. According to the scientist, the repressed conscious is similar to the actors, who have left the scene, though later they need to get back, but obviously wearing different outfits and playing another role, thus unrecognisable by the consciousness. The conscious is not aware either of their disappearance, or their return. The consciousness most probably does not correlate those who "get back" with those who have gone before, because such information has not been available to it under any circumstances and in any form. Otherwise, the "actors" could neither leave the stage of the conscious, nor return to it. The consciousness would create barriers by its intervention. We can agree with A. Sheroziya's assumption that the "stage performance", which forms the contents of the conscious, is inlikely to take place without these "actors' movements".

The interdependence of the two spheres of the psyche can be figuratively reflected when they compensate for each other, when they mutually exclude one another, and when they certify inaliable character of each other. Consequently, we can present the wholeness of the psyche we seek to learn focussing on the invisible horizon of the informational tangent point.

In the psychodynamic paradigm we have been developing for many years [4 - 8], due to the necessity for the psyche's wholeness cognition, the principle of complimentarity has been introduced as an underlying initial point of the psyche's wholeness disclosure. N. Bohr (1927) formulated the principle of complimentarity within the field of quantum mechanics. In psychodynamic paradigm, it was adapted to the specific subjectivity of the object of cognition and divided into two principles: the principle of inseparable character of the spheres of the conscious and the unconscious, and the principle of "from the other". The latter was outlined using a number of requirements a psychologist should follow in the process of diagnostic-corrective interaction with a respondent [6, pp. 17 - 19]. The fundamental aspect of this principle is the necessity to provide a respondent with an opportunity to manifest spontaneous activity, which naturally objectifies the efficiency's depth causes. As A. Sheroziya mentioned, that "in spontaneity of behaviour, the unconscious acts as the stability of the other logic, which renews itself persistently, which is the solely energetically powerful logic, however never unified" [4, p. 261].

Consequently, it is clear, that there is no fight for priorities of the conscious or the unconscious logic because of their existence in different functional systems, which do not allow them to be reciprocally sterilised, still being detected through their own integration into the subject's spontaneous behaviour. It would be incorrect to reduce artificially the logics mentioned above to the "common denominator" during a psycho-correction process, which is a priori impossible.

Their unity is noticeable only in the psyche S implicit order that becomes extended, visible and observed in a subject's behaviour.

A language of the conscious, invisible for itself produces latent dialectics of relationships set by the "other logic", where the categories of time, space, sex and causality function in a different way than in the conscious. Here, mnemonic imprints, ie centres of the repressed feelings, play a significant role in their synthesis with the psyche's archetypal nature that encloses the wisdom of previous generations and has the ability to manifest in the subject's individual experience. The psyche's archetypal nature is manifested in the visualised and objectified representation of the subject using an arsenal of images characteristic to its individualised world of the living and inanimate nature, and which can convey the information equivalents, ie the "contents" of psyche within the "other body". S. Leclaire marks that "it would be naive to attribute localisation of these archetypal imprints of human history only to the brain, as they are imprinted into the world everywhere" [1, p. 264]. It is impossible to categorise them, because the archetypes become relevant ("alive") only in association with the unconscious mnemonic imprints. These associations provide each individual with the psyche's characteristic uniqueness in its archetypal, ie objectified matifestation.

In solving the problem of the psyche's depth cognition, a dialogue as a psychologist's tool in the ASPC diagnostic and correction plays a crucial role. [5-8]. However, without any diagnostically adequate word correlation with direction of the unconscious energy potential, the dialogue would involve merely lifeless letters statically fixing the process of cognition, which is beyond the procedural extension.

Even though, the logic of the unconscious is distinguished by the paradoxical nature, the cognition of which becomes possible only with the participation of the language of the conscious. Each of the systems of the "conscious/unconscious" logic makes contact with one another and participates in the other system; yet, the outcomes do not reduce to any of them alone! Contact of the psyche's areas is even harder to perceive, than to catch the waves in the sound space. Here, we can reveal the significance of the problem of a dual unifying chain of the conscious and the unconscious interaction, which seems to be magically invisible, but obvious in the imperative of the influence on the behaviour of the subject of the psyche's implicit order. It is objectified especially clearly when a subject works with some classic paintings replicas. During such a spontaneous activity, a respondent can arrange in a hierarchy, rank selected paintings replicas in order of personal importance quickly and easily. A diagnostic-correctional dialogue follows the implicit order and simultaneously contributes to its revealing.

The category of “implicit order” is barely represented in the scientific psychological and philosophical literature. However, the ASPC practice proves the category to be Ariadne's thread leading to the key of solving problems of the subject's psyche's depth cognition in the most advantageous, and hence, the least emotionally devastating and most internally motivating way.

In fact, we can consider an issue of harmonisation of the psychologist's efforts with the immanent willingness and capability of psyche to support the process by the ability to organise and arrange the material, which is conditioned by its internal incentivised initiative. The explanation is as follows: the psyche's dysfunctions are caused by the energetic imperative of the imprints of the experienced hardships such as life dramas, "incomplete childhood dilemmas" that are synthesised in the implicit order. If psychologists follow the implicit order, they choose the most energy saving thus most advantageous way in the depth cognition. In the dialogic interaction with a respondent, we rely on the fact that the psyche is aware of everything (only the conscious is not), although, the psyche is not reduced to the conscious. This universal truth can be confirmed by the process of the sufficient transformation of the ideal (mental) reality into the visualised representations, including pictures, objects or words, as well as self-presentation with the personally selected of classical paintings replicas. We can affirm that the informational equivalents link an ideal and an objectified reality together by a semantic load of representations that is impossible beyond the implicit order. The psyche is familiar with its peculiar semantic baggage that justifies the psychologist's intentions to "follow the respondent”.

Implicit order - is a "following the..." concept. It is invisible and uncontrolled from the outside organisation of spontaneous manifestations of the the respondent's activity. It involves the latent determinism of activity's depth impulses, and which is important for a psychologist not only in order to understand and forecast based on all probabilties, but also to take into account when asking the respondents the questions, which should trigger an impulse for activity, which based on the unconscious motivation.

The strict sequence of the implicit order manifestation and methodological importance of its consideration within the diagnostic-corrective practice is explained by the fact that the order is formed involuntarily (beyond the control of consciousness) and has an ability to express generally the individual uniqueness of the psyche's functioning. Implicit order cannot be either wiped, or modified, or distorted, because it has not been written in advance and do not belong to any animate substratum; it is determined by the intersection, the interference of power grids, which are maintained by certain integrated Meta-meanings, applicable both to the conscious and the unconscious. That is why, the implicit order is manifested in the energy potency of a subject's spontaneous activity, which declares its location beyond "scholastic" requirements of any logic, whether of the conscious or of the unconscious (the"other logic").

The practice of the psyche's wholeness depth cognition proves that the implicit order is inherent to it immanently. It is obviously confirmed by the established a subject's ability to arrange selected paintings replicas in a hierarchy according to their importance. This procedure enhances and accelerates the psychoanalytic process of cognition. Procedural-diagnostic prognoses can be determined and carried out considerably intensely and speedily, easily and accurately. Moreover, they can be confirmed under conditions of understanding and actualising a respondent's capabilities to establish the sequence in using visualised, objectified material in the analytical diagnostic-correctional process.

Psychodynamic paradigm proves the psyche to possess the archetypal latent meanings that are objectified in a dialogue verbally and facilitate the subject's awareness of them through the personal involvement in the presentation procedure. In other words, the long-term practice convinces that the objectified material may be arranged in an indestructible sequence set by the implicit order and in accordance to the the respondent's priority initiative based on the significance of semantic loads. A respondent cannot explain intentionally what have caused the hierarchy arrangements of the visualised material, various pictures in particular, to be done exactly that way.

Therefore, the respondent's psyche has a semantic significance according to pictures presented. It is supported by psychoanalysis, which reveals the perfect arrangement of the material, depending on the semantic parameters that a priori (before analysis) were not known either to a respondent, or to a psychologist. And the procedure of their psychoanalytic cognition took place through a dialogic interaction (gradually and through various levels) and the analytical interaction "P. oR.".

We suppose that the language of the psyche in its wholeness is manifested in the meanings, where both spheres (the conscious/ the unconscious) are integrated functionally rather than in the images, symbols (language of the unconscious). It becomes a representation within the invisible, but almost concrete, implicit order, which is independent from the means of a subject's self-presentation, ie it is positioned over the experience and over the set sense.

The latter provides a psychologist with the broad opportunities to use certain means of depth cognition, which will drift to the clearway of the implicit order. This contributes to clarification of the psychoanalytic findings' reliability. A psychologist, who initiates a respondent's spontaneous activity, may not be afraid of breaking the cognitive basis of any specific-diagnostic conclusions. In the process of the respondent's pictures analysis, a psychologist can initiate a psychodrama fragment, stones modelling, or non-verbal exercises - the same implicit order of a particular person psyche will be obvious in every activity. The practice provides evidence that the paintings replicas contribute to the precise manifestation of the implicit order, apparently, because of the authorial pictures' psychologising. After all, any artistic painting comprises an emotional significance for the person behind. The number of such replicas enables a psychologist to identify priorities of the psyche's direction according to the parameters of the basic conflict "life-death". A psychocorrection procedure in the ASPC groups catalyses psychocorrectional refocus towards "life".

Our experience of more than thirty-five years of the psyche's depth cognition demonstrates that due to the objective laws of its internal organisation, activity is set by the factors of semantic significance, and the unawareness of them is not an obstacle to the depth cognition. These factors are manifested independently in the invariant, interative characteristics of the respondent spontaneous behaviour, which is holistically interpretable.

The conscious usually resists the revealing of the uncounscious semantic parameters. It proves the existence of the logics contradiction comprising the logic of the conscious and the logic of the unconscious (the "other" logic). The paradoxical fact here is that the implicit order does not solve the problem of ensuring the psyche's wholeness, though, it expresses it holistically through the coherence and continuity of the energy impulses driving to the "following the...”state in the empirical space. In addition, it sets the respondent's intrinsic motivation to the process of depth cognition. The implicit order cannot be objectified in a "pure form", as a given notion, autonomously from empirical procedural interaction within the system "P. o R.". The latter becomes complicated because that "following the..." does not involve objectifying the nature of the subject's spontaneous internal arrangements. The unconscious can be objectified depending on the context and under conditions of involuntary behaviour. As the implicit order is predetermined by the unconscious; it [the order] always has an energy force that determines the sequential efficiency of the motivational cause for the dialogic-analytical interaction. To conclude every aspect mentioned, we should state that in the "P.^ R." dialogic interaction, the implicit order affects to sequence of a subject's behaviour dynamics.

All data discussed allow us to differentiate between the process of depth cognition and the experimental-scholastic study, where the researcher determines the order of experimental procedure in advance. The leader of the depth cognition (a psychologist) is a "slave" following the continuum of a subject's extensive activity. Under such circumstances, psychologists fulfil themselves competently through the professional-informational suitability of the questions to the respondent. The questions are set on a probabilistic prognosis. Therefore, a psychocorrectional dialogue differs from a dialogue in its typical meaning of the information coveyance and exchange. In the ASPC, the information needs to be acquired based on the combination of diagnosis and correction, their measured use on various levels. A psychologist involved in the procedure specifies only the backgrounds of objectifying and finding information of the depth cognition in accordance to the dynamics of a dialogic interaction within an immanent sequence of a respondent's spontaneous activity. This enables the longitudinal interpretation of the respondent's overall behavioural material. The psychologist's interaction with the respondent actualises the detection sequence of semantic parameters in spontaneity of the activity. The questions' diagnostic capacity of the given format is manifested in arousal of the motivational impulse of energy in accordance to meanings of semantic loads causing the impulses to act.

A psychologist's diagnostic accuracy is successful when their initiatives meet the requirements of the implicit order including and considering all the previous behavioural material of the respondent from the beginning of the session. This determines the predictive foundation for the psychologist's next step and the catalysing power of the questions in triggering the respondent to activity. The implicit order exists in concordance with the energy potency of the respondent's motivation to the "P.-^-R." interaction. The respondent's activity depends not only on the motivational forces of the latent characteristics and their impact on behaviour, but also on the initiatives's arousal caused by certain visualised tools that act as the depth cognition mediator. As I. Prigogine pointed out "...there is a need for a dialogue with the nature for its cognition" [3, p. 280]. This means that a psychologist not only can but also should influence the depth cognition through a sufficient diagnosis, where the major assistant is probabilistic prognosis of the psyche's implicit order. At the same time, the psychologist either can have or do have no professional rights to set and to influence the content of spontaneity, as well as to place accents independently beyond the predetermined order of the respondent's involuntary activity.

The psychodynamic dialogue, on one hand, takes into consideration the subject's energy potency manifested in the implicit order, and on the other hand, it is conducted under conditions of the initial opacity and obscurity of the individually predetermined respondent's behaviour, especially under conditions of the independent selection of artistic paintings replicas from an offered range. In order to ensure the probabilistic prognosis and to predict the respondent's behaviour risks, a psychologist should acquire skills in diagnostic-correctional practices oriented to the respondent's behaviour, which has been catalysed by the implicit order as the adept of the tangent nature of both areas of the psyche. This will provide the psychologist with the opportunity to get closer to the cognition of the semantics of the imperative of certain "depth" psyche features that define the transit of the life difficulties experienced by the subject, and exist beyond the efficiency period of the "imprint effects" (fixations). The priority of the dialogue (the way and sequence of the questions asked) over any other methodological techniques can be explained by the ability to reveal the depth psyche features in involuntary behaviours and activities. The dialogue also prevents the psychologist from imposing the false "truths" upon the respondent. The transitional and final chains of the psychologist's interpretative generalisations of the respondent's spontaneous-behavioural material can assist in this procedure.

Thus, in the depth cognition, the psychologist acts as a trigger of the intrinsic-motivational impulses of the subject's activity focussed on the representative self-visualising and objectifying their self-perception. The ASPC organisational settings are crucial from the point of view of introducing a number of principles, namely absence of criticism, judgements in black and white categories, imposed instructions, pieces of advice etc.

The research demonstrates that the subject's energy activity is influenced by the imprints of a perinatal, pre-lingual period of a person's development, which represents an additional argument for using non-verbal methods able to objectify engrams, not represented verbally, fixations of a pre-lingual period in depth knowledge.

The interpretation of the behavioural material obtained in spontaneous dialogic interaction makes it possible to reveal the contradiction between the logic of the conscious (declaration of a person's desires and aspirations) and the logic of behaviour. Analytical interpretations of results encompass both verbal statements and nonverbal representants (paintings, moldings, stone crafts), which acquire the interpretive equality in the process of generalisations of the total behavioral material. The latter is understandable if the research focusses on the horizon of the tangent point of both areas of the psyche and considers their functional incompatibility. If psychologists do not stick to such methodological requirements in some types of activity, for example art-therapy, they are reduced only to visualisation without further psychoanalysis. It nullifies the possibilities to use the psyche's willingess to "cooperate" in the process of its depth cognition.

The professionalism of a psychologist is in the ability to catalyse the process of dialogic achievements, to accumulate diagnostically credible behavioural material that requires cutting off "noise" behavioural material that is not essential for depth cognition of the psyche, for example philosophical or academical musings. It is important to understand that under certain conditions, a visualised representant (drawings, moldings etc.) may be shifted to the category of "mediator" of depth cognition. That fact is linked to subjectifying emotional contents of a visualised representant with the individualised meaning.

The presence of the imperative energy of the "striving to the surface" unconscious manifestation conditions is combined with the uncertainty of the subject's behaviour forms. Consequently, it is significant to understand the possibility of actualisation the resistance mechanisms blocking the manifestations of the psyche's semantic aspects that are dangerous for the Ego's self-esteem. The duty of a psychologist is to neutralise the resistance mechanisms, to move them apart, to alleviate and to weaken them. Abilities of the psychologist to make predictions are meaningless without a sensible attitude to the psyche's internal implicit order. The proper attitude contributes to the efficiency of asking diagnostically correct questions and making suggestions to a respondent concerning the experience visualisation based on the involuntary activity.

Spontaneous objectification of the psyche's unconscious meanings meets the requirements of the laws of the psyche's positive disintegration and its secondary integration at the upper level of the subject's psyche development. In the process of psychoanalysis, it is essential to consider the unconscious as "striving to the surface", on one hand, and as behaviourally camouflaging its meanings, on the other hand. Consequently, a psychologist should be skilled not only in catalysing the unconscious manifestation, but also in decoding its meaning (sense). This requires ability to make an extended analysis of the dialogue. The psychology's cooperation with a respondent contributes to the amassing of the behavioural material, which is semantically potent in the process of objectifying the psyche's latent-semantic parameters requiring interpretation. Under such conditions, the dialogue becomes a catalyst of the psyche's "energetic willingness” to reveal the behaviour predetermined character caused by unconscious factors.

The implicit order, as mentioned already, correlates with the boundary, with the so-called invisible horizon, the contact point of the conscious and the unconscious. With regard to the functional incompatibility of both areas of the psyche, this order integrates the power fields "from both sides" (the conscious/ the unconscious). Therefore, expansion of the individually unique initiative may be associated with the presence illogicality and irrationality of tendencies, which are influenced by visualisation in the subject's spontaneous self-presentation.

In other words, the sequential expansion of the respondent's behaviour does not follow a logical order. This indicates the assimilation of semantic aspects of the psyche's both areas, which are functionally incompatible (asymmetric) by the implicit order. The implicit order objectifies the psyche in the subject's spontaneous behaviour in a holistic and invisible way to the Ego. The appropriateness of the psychologist's questions is substantiated not only by their comprehensibility for the respondent, but also by their ability to actualise the energetic impulse of behaviour by "the other" area (the unconscious). Manifestation of the implicit order can be figuratively comparable to the calendar, with the pages strictly arranged and that, however, can be full with the individualised and diametrically opposite contents. The psyche's semantic parameters are unique and invisible for each respondent, as well as the sequence of their manifestation outwards is.

S. Leclaire wrote, "... the presence of "the other logic", logic of the unconscious has been revealed only in the field of the psychoanalytic experience. Moreover, it is absolutely necessary for those, who claim to conduct a thorough scientific study of the human psyche's nature, to reckon with this "other logic" [1, p. 269]. The psychologist cannot observe and consider this exact "other logic", as well as the implicit order in isolation. The "other logic" can be objectified in the "P.oR." professional-dialogic interaction based on naturalness of the respondent behaviour as well as its professional catalysation by the psychologist's diagnostically appropriate questions.

Concerning the orientation of the psychodynamic paradigm onto the "invisible horizon" of the contact of both areas, the psychologist's understanding of the important character of the dynamics of the dialogic catalysing of the psyche's implicit order in a particular person is a prerequisite for a successful diagnostic-correctional process. We can definitely point to an influential energetic power of the unconscious in its influence on the nature of the person's spontaneous behavior. Expanding of the subject's consciousness is due to the extension of recognition of the psyche's internal personal contradictions that opens the prospects of finding a solution. The psychocorrectional effect is manifested in the psyche's harmonising, enhancing its sensitivity and adaptability to a society.

Thus, we can substantiate our attention to the implicit order, which latently assimilates and integrates dominant "worries" of both areas, as well as coordinates dynamics of the subject's spontaneous activity. The psychodynamic paradigm takes into account a programmed character of the unconscious determined by the inexhaustible "over definiteness", which indicates the need for the psychologist orientation to the fact, that "the psyche is aware of everything”, including that the subject's conscious Self is not.

Summing up, we would like to emphasise that any act of spontaneous behaviour occurs with the assistanceof the system of psychological defence mechanisms that camouflage the nature of the psyche's order. In regards to the types of the defence mechanisms identified by us, basal ("the horizontal"), and peripheral (" the vertical"), the psyche's single act always manifests at the junction of "the vertical" and "the horizontal". In its explication, the unconscious solves two problems: to manifest outwards and camouflage its interests (the semantic parameters). Rebuttal of this fact requires the psychologist's skills in dialogical accomplishments of diagnostically effective behavioural material with its consequent longitudinal interpretation. In the process of interpretation, verbal and nonverbal aspects of self-presentation acquire an equival status, which corresponds to the fact of integration of the conscious (verbal) and the unconscious (figurative-symbolic) contents in the inner implicit order. The implicit order's nature concealed from the Self ensures the order's purity by means of influence of "socialisation", which actually gives birth to the Self.

We are convinced that the energy centres of mnemonic imprints, which do not exist isolated from each other, play a foremost role in shaping the logic of the unconscious, ie the "other logic". Such synthesis of imprints effects, compared to the logic of the conscious, is caused by the process of irradiation of repressed energy, with integration consequences to reflects generally the category of "meta experienced" ("beyond experiential") [7]. Because of the latent character of these processes, we cannot cognise this or that mnemonic imprint of repression as an autonomous factor in the subject's behaviour. The process of synthesis is abstracted from the thematically situational aspects of behaviour: it sets the vector of the subject's internal willingness to act. Moreover, we can detect the potential of unrealised (displaced) energy, which is manifested in the subject's activity impulses motivationally linked to the implicit order right behind that vector. Therefore, the specifics of the repressed not available for cognition, refers to the over experiential synthesis of the tangent point of both systems of the psyche: the conscious/ the unconscious.

Methodological strictness of depth cognition is manifested in the adherence to the established psyche's aspects that open up in the unique dynamics for each subject. As a result, the individualised psychocorrection effect is achieved through the objectification of information, which has been beyond perception, and which opens the prospects of resolving internal stabilised contradictions set by the subject and stimulates personal harmonisation (homeostasis) of the psyche at all levels including structural, energetical and functional ones.

In lieu of conclusions: Let us appreciate the subject's psyche for "being aware of everything" and for allowing a professional to rely on it in the process of giving the subject diagnostic-correctional help through expanding social-perceptual knowledge, as well as developing reflective intelligence. Special recognition goes to the implicit order for its objectivity and ability to catalyse the process of depth cognition and self-knowledge of a respondent energetically. This motivates and optimises the "P.oR." dialogical interaction and offers the prospects of the psyche's scientific cognition.

Additional gratitude goes to the Self for its social progressive character and aspirations to expand of knowledge about itself; for motivation for self-cognitive interest; for the ability to create the psyche's representative visualisation in its objectified forms, which are informational equivalents.

The subject's consciousness deserves appreciation for the following:

• non-interference in the displacement processes of the preconsciousness (the unconscious) formation specifying the objective nature of the psyche's depth parameters;

• the community (antinomy) of relationships of the psyche's substructures (not just the antagonism of the Super-Ego and the Id);

• the psyche's opportunities to preserve of informational equivalents in the process of transformation of the ideal [the psyche's one] reality into the objective (available for the researcher in order to perceive and interpret) determined by the activity of the language of the figurative-symbolic representations archetypes;

• reciprocal functional involvement of the areas the conscious and the unconscious with the invisible boundaries (horison) of a contact point of the psyche's areas, maintaining their autonomy and functional asymmetry. The latter is synthesised in the implicit order, which is beyond the scholastic disciplinary requirements of any logic and is manifested in both rationality, and irrationality of the subject's behaviour acts.

The biggest appreciation should go to the subject as a carrier of the psyche for the next aspects:

• the unconscious internal motivational initiative that promotes a psychologist's access to the essence of the psyche's wholeness with the purpose of its depth cognition;

• maintainence of the interest to itself despite the lack of ability to control the specific manifestations of the depth factors in the observed area etc. Since these aspects unlock the prospects of the psyche's holistic cognition.

Only the subject can modify individual behaviour through expanding reflexive knowledge, enhancing understanding of cognitive-protective deformations and dysfunctions contradictory to the self-preservation instinct. Arousal of the self-preservation instinct is a leading catalyst of necessary individual self-transformations "towards life" and towards social self-assertion.

In the psychodynamic practice of depth cognition, there are cases, when people not familiar to the specifics of this kind of work and unable to reflection and self-reflection have been included into the ASPC (depth cognition) group. Nevertheless, they are able to conduct corrections successfully due to the arousal of the initiative of self-knowledge motivation. People have managed to succeed owing to the psychologist's professional abilities to consider the implicit order of naturalness of the respondent's initiative manifestation. Professionalism of the psychologist is in the ability to ensure the arbitrary way of a diagnostic- correctional process in the presence of the impulse of behaviour arousal (energetic "preheating"), which is linked to a lack of implementation of certain repressed needs preserving the motivational potential focussed on completion. The latter substantiates manifestations of the psyche's destructive tendencies of "forced repetition" and walking in "vicious circle" that require to be eased.

Methodological significance of understanding the "implicit order" (for organisation of the psyche's depth cognition course) consists of saving the order's latency character for a respondent and of considering it properly when arranging a dialogic diagnostic-correctional process.

The issue of the implicit order has Meta importance for a psychologist in determining the vector of professional efforts in the process of granting the subject crucial assistance intended to solve personal problems (stabilised internal contradictions).

The process of granting the subject professional help in understanding the psyche's defence mechanisms destruction determined by the preset tendencies in dynamics that prove an ineffective waste of energy and contradiction to the psyche's needs of social adaptation will be optimised when psychologists consider the implicit order. The easing of the subject's psyche destructions can be achievable under conditions of expansion of the subject's reflexive knowledge and development of social-perceptual intelligence. All these factors highlight the adequacy of individuals' informational competence in understanding the depth essence of their personal problems and contribute to compensating (leveling) the illogicality and regressive forms of behaviour, as well as eliminating barriers on the person's way to self-actualisation of the potential in the process of social self-realisation.

Diagnostical psychocorrectional work with the respondent N., with use of art paintings replicas, stones and a respondent's own picture

N. is a first year student of Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy (2016). It is a group session according to the ASPC method.

P: Choose the pictures emotionally appealing to you. Lay out the pictures (one by one) according to their importance to you, please. Choose the picture we will start to work with. (To the audience): we rely on the fact, that the human psyche is aware of everything, but the conscious is not aware of that. You need to make efforts for that knowledge to become acquired by the consciousness in its personal growth. Let's proceed to the discussion of the picture. Tell me what you see in picture 1.

N: I see a desert... A man with the cross on his back... Broken chess pieces... Clouds in the sky...

P: What is the most important for you from all you've mentioned?

N: The man with the cross is the central figure for me.

P: Is there, in this man figure, anything you have experienced before?

N: Yes, there is. Should I tell you what my experience was?

P: It is important to clarify what this man has in common with you.

N: Probably, it is the ability to carry the cross on, as it is quite difficult.

P: Thus, do you understand the metaphorical symbol, the cross? Is it filled with the certain personal unique contents for you? If I were you, I would obviously choose an animate figure among of those chess pieces, too. But, as for this "cross", does it embody your emotions, feelings? Do the broken chess figures mean anything?

N: I do not know. I think the picture is a kind of gloomy. It is close to my mood, but I do not like it in general. Simply, the first thing that strokes my eye was an animate figure with the cross. So, I could not help taking it.

P: It is noteworthy that among of all pictures, you, N., have chosen exactly this one (Fig. 1), and lay it first for the analysis. So, is it significant? Does it reflect certain troubles? Look, we have the broken chess figures, the cross, which is carried by the man, the desert, the absence of others people, and the obviously threatening sky that can break out with rain or a storm. Is there anything from your experience that has left a similar trace? Are you still bearing it inside?

N: Certainly. It is and always will be inside me. It is a definite and hard to bear trace.

P: Is it of some sort of a personal loss or difficult relationships?

N: Relationships.

P: Relationships and breaking up?

N: No, just bad relationships.

P: You say bad relationships. Were they beyond the family or within the family?

N: Within the family.

P: Are they your own relationships? Or are you worried about the family relationships (for example, "mother - father" relationships), which make your life complicated?

N: Both of them, my own and a family one, - relationships that are hard for me.

P: Here we have the double difficulty. That is why; there are broken figures (pointing to the chess on Fig. 1). Did you have any loss, failure, disappointment?

N: There was much failure. The cases are impossible to count.

P: How does it influence your life now? Your choice was far from being random. Do you realise that it makes your life oppressed in general?

N: I think it is so. I find it very hard to trust people and to let them in. I am mostly alone.

P: You have experienced some disappointment. Was the person who disappointed you the one you trusted? Did you rely on him or her?